<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moorcock on the Couch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/</link>
	<description>science fiction, fantasy, and horror book reviews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:29:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ward</title>
		<link>http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billwardwriter.com/?p=2691#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know that, interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know that, interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Murphy</title>
		<link>http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billwardwriter.com/?p=2691#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, I don&#039;t own Wizardry and Wild Romance so I can&#039;t say how much the essay has changed over the years. But since the online version of the essay contains references to Pullman&#039;s &quot;His Dark Materials&quot; trilogy, it&#039;s safe to say he revisted/updated it in the late 1990s, if not later. It appears he still stands behind what he wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, I don&#8217;t own Wizardry and Wild Romance so I can&#8217;t say how much the essay has changed over the years. But since the online version of the essay contains references to Pullman&#8217;s &#8220;His Dark Materials&#8221; trilogy, it&#8217;s safe to say he revisted/updated it in the late 1990s, if not later. It appears he still stands behind what he wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ward</title>
		<link>http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billwardwriter.com/?p=2691#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>I think you did a really good job -- and that your focus was much more sober and well-constructed than his original (which reads something like a ranting blog post from what I recall). 

Do you happen to know if he ever revisited his thesis? It&#039;s been thirty years, I wonder if he&#039;s ever modified his position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you did a really good job &#8212; and that your focus was much more sober and well-constructed than his original (which reads something like a ranting blog post from what I recall). </p>
<p>Do you happen to know if he ever revisited his thesis? It&#8217;s been thirty years, I wonder if he&#8217;s ever modified his position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Murphy</title>
		<link>http://billwardwriter.com/moorcock-on-the-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billwardwriter.com/?p=2691#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip o&#039; the cap, Bill. I&#039;ve had this essay formulating for some time now.

It was hard trying to parse out Moorcock&#039;s textual and literary criticism from the political screed running throughout the essay, but once I did, I felt like he mis-read The Lord of the Rings (and The Silmarillion) rather badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip o&#8217; the cap, Bill. I&#8217;ve had this essay formulating for some time now.</p>
<p>It was hard trying to parse out Moorcock&#8217;s textual and literary criticism from the political screed running throughout the essay, but once I did, I felt like he mis-read The Lord of the Rings (and The Silmarillion) rather badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
