The First Line of Neuromancer

by Bill Ward on November 29, 2011

in On Books

This short essay, ‘Future Realities: The First Line of Neuromancer,’ originally appeared in the Winter 2009 issue of The First Line.

William Gibson’s 1984 blockbuster Neuromancer forever changed the way science fiction was written – and the way, too, we look at our own future. Slick and seedy, hardboiled as any noir thriller yet rich with New Wave stylistic pyrotechnics, and packed with enough extrapolative speculation and real-world texture that the future it describes feels, not like the product of one man’s imagination, but more the inevitable revelations of a prophet. This legendary book has an opening line to match, one that points clearly at the themes and questions Gibson explores: “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.”

The most striking part of that line is, of course, the use of television static to describe the natural world. That we can see with perfect, intuitive understanding exactly what this image depicts* with its juxtaposition, and that it feels at once completely natural and perhaps a bit startling to us, only reinforces that we ourselves are living in the world Gibson describes. His near future is a place where a suite of technologies — electronic, genetic, and informational — infuse and inform all human activity. It is our own world to the nth degree, the post-everything world that we already feel spinning out of control around us, one in which we are increasingly uncertain of what it is to be human.

As famous as Neuromancer’s opening line is, it is also famously misquoted, “above the port” tending to be omitted when people repeat the line from memory.  This is unfortunate as ‘port’ is a key component of the line. The port in question is Chiba City, the outlaw edge of Tokyo, where down on his luck hacker Case functions as a low-level cog in the black market machinery of the city’s criminal underworld. Gibson’s internationalist vision is laid out in these opening scenes, where the polyglot and culturally syncretic streets of Chiba City show us the future of our world in microcosm. Here is a place of startling contrasts and unexpected convergences, home to drug runners, data thieves, rogue geneticists, and players large and small in the pushing of humanity’s envelope of possibilities. Chiba City, a port open to all the world has to offer, is no mere melting pot, it is a blast furnace producing startling new alloys of experience. Once out of Japan, Gibson takes us on a tour spanning his near future, from the slummy conurbation of the Eastern USA, to a strange and familiar Istanbul, and into the new worlds of space itself, and always he presents us with an amalgam, formed by a planet grown so small its every border overlaps.

But ‘ports’ are also the name given to skull jacks with which people can interface directly with machines — and, as it turns out, machines can do the same with people. Case is one such ‘data cowboy’ a man addicted to the rush of direct mind contact with computers. It’s a spiritual craving on his part, a state of being preferable to dwelling within his drug-addicted, damaged physical shell. Here is where cyberspace gets its start – and it is in Neuromancer that the word first appears – but it is also a telling glimpse of virtual states of being in which technology, for the first time, can give us realms of existence beyond that of any drug, mania, or religious ecstasy. This brave new virtual world is also where the book presents its essential question: what is it to be human in the age of technology?

Organic or mechanical? Virtual or physical? Television or sky? From the first line Neuromancer reveals exactly what questions it will pose, and what themes it celebrates. But it is not just a television image that has replaced our sky, but a blank, dead channel, and the tone of pessimism that pervades the novel as Case and company travel throughout the dingy and cobbled together world of Neuromancer suggests there is a lie inherent in the liberating promise of technology. And it is this final, cynical signature to the opening line that sites the reader so firmly within the mind-space of William Gibson as he unfolds his bleak vision of humanity’s future.

*of course the solid bright blue screens of modern digital television ‘dead channels’ may undermine this metaphor for generations that have never grown up seeing TV static.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Fletcher A. Vredenburgh November 30, 2011 at 11:42 pm

I went out and bought it at the original Forbidden Planet in Manhattan within days of reading a review of it in “Whispers” and I was blown away by it. I’ve reread it several times over the years and liked it a little less every time.
I’m not really sure why – the coolness factor of Molly, the Dixie Flatline and other things never diminished. Perhaps it is because of its apprehension at the future of man subsumed by technology. I don’t feel that way and never really have so maybe the questions it raising alongside the noir plotting don’t interest me.
It’s been so long that I should probably go back to it and see if I can understand why.

Bill Ward December 5, 2011 at 10:43 am

I’ve read it three times — I think my appreciation for it has actually increased, even though it feels less and less like the future every time. It is rather pessimistic about the role of technology on humanity, but I think it’s more about distrusting technology as a panacea.

Eh, you got me thinking now, I feel like I have to go read it again!

Fletcher A. Vredenburgh December 5, 2011 at 4:42 pm

Yeah, started back on it myself and so far it’s definitely caught me up like when I was eighteen. Almost thirty years later I’m at an age where I can step back from the coolness and plot and appreciate Gibson’s style (which so far I do very much).

Bill Ward December 5, 2011 at 8:49 pm

His style really struck me this last time I read it, which is why I used a showy kind of quote for the tag on my review rather than the iconic opening line. I jumped from that to Burning Chrome to soak up some more of that early style.

My impression of his later novels was that they were a bit smoother and less pyrotechnic, but I’ve only read them all once and it’s been over a decade…

Man, the last thing I needed now was another reading project!

Leave a Comment